Comparing 3D printers like QIDI vs FlashForge is a difficult task, and a lot of factors are involved in the process. QIDI vs. Flashforge provide us with one of the most relevant comparisons in the real industry.
QIDI Technology 3D printer (QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer)
Product Description QIDI vs FlashForge
This QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer description will help you on the QIDI vs FlashForge review or comparison.
- QIDI Technology 3D Printer or most commonly the QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer is the most precise and dependable 3D printer.
- Each QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer is levelled, fully calibrated and operated 8 hours before delivery.
- QIDI TECH after-sales team supplies technical support and lifetime service for the QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer.
Key Features QIDI vs FlashForge
Those key features are essential to understanding the QIDI vs FlashForge comparison.
- Active Aviation level aluminium plate guarantees its surface is completely flat and will not warp during the heating process.
- Fully metal External frame much stronger than PVC plate and wooden frame.
- The new high heat resistant metal platform supports the replacement of plastic.
- Imported 8MM axis, hardness naturally greater than domestic 10MM.
- Circuit program upgrades, resolve the static which produced during the printing process or working in the dry place.
Package QIDI vs FlashForge
- The QIDI TECH I-Dual Extruder.
- Two spools filament (N.W.:1kg per spool, material).
- 2x filament guide tubes-Screws, kits in accessories bag.
- Power Supply Cable.
- USB Cable-End stop switch cable(spare part) Acrylic covers kits.
- One 4GB SD card(contains software, test sample files, and operation manual).
Prints QIDI vs FlashForge
- Building Size: 230x150x150mm.
- Build Volume: About 5 litres.
- Layer Thickness: 0.1-0.3mm(adjustable).
- Nozzle Diameter: 0.4mm.
- Software: Replicator G, Markerware.
- Compatibility: Windows, Mac OSX, Linux, etc.
- Print from: SD card or connect USB.
- Input file type: STL, G code.
Material QIDI vs FlashForge
- Works well with 1.75mm ABS, PLA filament.
Dimension QIDI vs FlashForge
- Overall Dimension: 465x320x375mm.
- Packing Dimension: 570x440x560mm.
- Product Dimensions: 18.3 x 12.6 x 14.8 inches ; 46.3 pounds.
Shipping Weight QIDI vs FlashForge
- 83 pounds.
Flashforge Creator 3D Printer – Flashforge Creator Pro vs QIDI
We start now with the Flashforge Creator Pro vs QIDI comparison.
This state of the art Flashforge Creator 3D Printer has dual extruders for running two colour schemes into your designs.
It is pre-packaged with a 4GB sd card and easy to use Replicator G and Makerware modelling software.
If you have any doubts about comparing QIDI vs FlashForge then you must read carefully.
Another interesting 3D Printer is the FlashForge Dreamer.
In this Flashforge Creator Pro vs QIDI comparison, we should remark that the Flashforge Creator 3D Printer is pre-packaged with a 4GB sd card and easy to use Replicator G and Makerware modelling software.
If that’s not enough, this sleek 3D printer undergoes 8 hours of testing before it even leaves the factory.
As you can see, the QIDI Technology dual extruder desktop 3D printer has many advantages too, so you should careful consider both alternatives in your next purchase.
If you want an amazingly high-quality 3D printer then I highly recommend this one, it may not be a Flashforge, but it is precisely the same as the Flashforge 3D printer Creator Pro and perhaps even slightly better.
Flashforge vs. QIDI
The Flashforge and the QIDI printers are very similar, both being Replicator clones.
The primary difference between the two models is the price. The FlashForge is more expensive than the QIDI.
Both builds have sturdy metal frames and use similar components.
An insignificant difference between the two printers is the motherboard.
Although the boards are quite similar, which are both variations of the MightyBoard architecture, the FlashForge uses an Atmega 2560, and the QIDI uses the 1280 version. There is no performance difference between the two chips. 2560 simply has a larger flash size which is a nice feature but does not have any advantages over 1280.
Another insignificant difference is that the FlashForge boasts some colour LEDs that put on a light show. This fact is not exactly what one would call a deal breaker for the serious 3D printer purchase.
The QIDI has 1″ diameter spool holders which will fit just about every filament spool.
FlashForge, on the other hand, wanted to use a large spool holder that will only fit spools with a bore hole over 2 inches. That can pose a significant problem if you like to use Hatchbox filaments as I do. You could always print your spool holders if you wanted to use anything smaller than this large 2-inch bore.
Another distinct advantage the QIDI 3D printer has over the FlashForge 3D printer creator pro is the acrylic side panels and metal back.
FlashForge opted to go with Black solid styrene panels on the sides and the back. The additional light provided by the transparent acrylic panels is a distinct advantage and lets visual inspection proceed without error.
QIDI support is exceptional. I had a few issues with mine, and they were extremely responsive and seemed to care genuinely about my problems. I can’t say I’ve ever had a better experience.